Toxic office politics abound
Pros: Office Free Lunch Pretty Good GenAI use cases to work on
Cons: If you're looking for a workplace where your work speaks louder than office politics, think twice. Long hours were normalized, employees were constantly compared against each other, and raising genuine concerns often felt risky—it seemed like speaking up could even put your job at risk. In my experience, HR didn't feel impartial and appeared to side with management rather than listening fairly to both perspectives. What stood out the most was the lack of flexibility when issues arose within a team. Even when someone had genuine concerns about their team or manager, changing teams didn't seem to be an option. The message from senior leadership came across more like a warning: if you want to stay in the company, stay in the team you're assigned to; otherwise, you're free to leave the organization. That made it feel like employees had to choose between tolerating an unhealthy situation or resigning. It also felt like favoritism played a significant role. Employees who consistently agreed with their managers appeared to receive better treatment, while those who questioned decisions or raised concerns could face unnecessary comparisons, personal criticism, or have their performance overshadowed. Strong technical work can quickly lose its value in an environment where management practices, internal politics, and favoritism seem to matter more than merit. I wouldn't recommend joining if you're expecting a culture built on fairness, transparency, and open communication.
View on Glassdoor