SIXT India

2 leetcode rounds, 1 hiring manager, 1 hr round, easy interview, focus on system design, I was asked on how to delete an element in binary tree, and some complex pagination question in python, thought process is valued

The interview process was divided into 3–4 rounds. The first two rounds were technical and focused on integrations, automation, and project-related discussions. Both technical interviews were well-structured, relevant, and overall a good experience. One area that could be improved is the interview logistics. The first round was conducted online, but I was still required to be physically present at the office, which felt a bit inconvenient. Since the later rounds were in-person, it makes sense to invite shortlisted candidates to the office at that stage. Allowing candidates to attend the initial online round from their preferred location would make the process more convenient while still maintaining the effectiveness of the later in-person discussions.

first round consists of 2 coding questions medium to hard level and 20 mcqs consists o os , dbms, and some networking . first technical round they asked one dsa question to solve which is of medium level and asked about the project details that i have done. some question nased on sql and os also asked.

Good, interviewers were friendly. Online assessment was conducted, those selected were interviewed. 3 Technical interviews and one HR interview. Technical interviews had DSA questions from leetcode, OOPS concepts and SQL queries. Part of On campus drive.

I had a very disappointing experience with the interview process. After clearing two technical rounds, I was invited for a face-to-face round in Bangalore. I traveled over 2500 km from my hometown to attend, only to find that the interviewer was not present in the office and the interview was eventually conducted virtually. Following this, I went through additional rounds (Technical, Hiring Manager, and HR). However, at the end of the process, I was told that my technical feedback was not positive. This raises serious questions — if my technical skills were not considered good enough, then why was I progressed through multiple rounds and even asked to travel such a long distance for an F2F round? This reflects a lack of respect for candidates’ time, effort, and resources. The process seemed poorly organized and left me with a very negative impression of how the company treats prospective employees. I would strongly caution candidates to think twice before engaging with this company’s interview process, as it feels misleading and inconsiderate.