PairSoft

It was very simple process, in the tech interview, generic questions from online sources are asked. It did not have much on problem solving or prior experience. It was more like Q&A test.

The process started normally — I applied through the careers page, shared additional details, and completed an assessment where I scored in the 95th percentile. Things became interesting in the L2 round. The discussion turned into a rapid-fire session of 50+ questions across multiple domains, including areas not even mentioned in the job description. I answered the majority of them correctly (~90%+), but it was hard to understand what exactly was being evaluated — depth, breadth, or just endurance. Post-interview, the experience declined further. There was no proactive communication, and I had to follow up multiple times, only to eventually receive a generic automated rejection email — no feedback, no insights. Overall, the process felt less like a structured evaluation and more like an attempt to make the interview appear “rigorous” by asking a high volume of scattered questions. Without clear expectations or meaningful feedback, it doesn’t seem like an effective way to identify the right candidates — just a time-consuming exercise for both sides.