ABB

They first did resume based shortlist since it was on campus so it as based on cgpa,then group discussion then technical round followed by managerial round and then the hr round

Data structures and algorithms ,group discussions , computer network(CN) and operating systems (OS) but more of cyber security and the basic stuff that goes , the dsa question are of medium ones

I completed my first interview on May 5th, 2026, followed by an in-person interview on May 25th that included three rounds: two technical and one managerial. The interviews went well, and the hiring manager's feedback was positive. However, I haven't received any updates from HR despite sending two follow-up emails. Last week, I received an email explaining that I'm advancing in the recruitment process for a different ABB role. The message stated they would focus on that application and close this one for clarity, noting that I might receive automated system emails marking this application as unsuccessful, which wouldn't impact my other application under review. I'm confused because ABB Workday shows my current application status as "Unsuccessful," but I don't see any other active or under-review applications in the system. Has anyone experienced a similar situation at ABB? Should I continue waiting for HR to respond, or would you recommend another approach?"

"The interview process was organized and professional. It consisted of an initial screening round, followed by a technical discussion and a final HR round. The interviewers asked questions related to my background, skills, and problem-solving approach. The overall experience was positive, and communication throughout the process was clear."

First Round: Online technical test featuring a full-stack application development assignment hosted on the DoSelect portal. Second Round (In-Person Hackathon): We were instructed to arrive by 9:00 AM, but the event didn't start until 10:30 AM. Out of approximately 6 candidates present, we were divided into two teams of 3. The organization was highly inefficient; the interviewers wasted over 3 hours just trying to grant us repository access, set up the Wi-Fi, and provide the design assets. Despite this massive delay, our team successfully built a live, working application with a demoable UI that met the core problem statement. Unfortunately, during the final review, the panel heavily penalized us for missing basic code validations — edge cases we simply didn't have time to implement due to the 3-hour setup delay caused by the company. The entire process felt unorganized and unfair, resulting in a wasted day and a very frustrating candidate experience