InfoBeans

It was a pathetic and disappointing experience with the organization. There was 1 round. It went well and after shortlisting the company ghosted me. The HR and her manager kept on lying the whole time for 2 weeks complete saying the client will review your candidature. There was an excuse everytime I try to follow up such as the client doesn't have slot, the client is busy etc. After 2 weeks and multiple followups over calls she said the client rejected your candidature without any reason. This was very misleading and unacceptable since it was more than 2 weeks and now client says this. I asked her the feedback to which she didn't had any response. I would say proceed at your own risk. The company waste candidate's time and efforts

I interviewed with Infobeans in May for Talent Acquisition role. I received call from Infobeans, the person did my screening call and told he will get back to me about the technical round on Monday, I did multiple follow ups, he did not respond and on Friday I finally got confirmation for technical round. I cleared technical and got eligible for Hr round. This round went well too, and did not receive any negative signal. I waited for 2 weeks, did follow up via email and calls but HR did not pick up my phone. I don’t understand how much efforts do it take on HR’s part to just inform selected/not selected/on hold/ no clarity yet from the top management. You may not have the policy to revert back to a candidate but at least respect those who follow up with you. I have maintained professionalism since day one and almost agreed upon everything, but lack of communication led to a very disappointing experiencing. Future candidates, please make sure that at the end of the final interview you ask them to revert to you, else they wont bother. Company won’t understand the anxiety and sleepless nights of those who are looking for job urgently. I did not expect a “people first environment and great place to work company” to be this disrespectful towards the candidates who could have potential to be your permanent employee.

My interview experience with Infobeans for the Performance Automation Engineer role was very disappointing. The L1 interview felt heavily focused on textbook-style questioning rather than practical performance engineering concepts. At one point, the discussion around load profiling lacked depth, and the expectation seemed to be very specific keyword-based answers rather than understanding the actual concept. As part of the process, I was asked to solve 3 Python coding problems, all of which I completed successfully with working outputs. I was also asked to write a performance test script using , which I completed during the interview itself. Despite performing well in the practical sections, I later received negative feedback without any meaningful explanation. The overall experience felt inconsistent and unfortunately came across as a poor use of the candidate’s time. I strongly believe interview processes should evaluate practical skills, real-world problem solving, and domain understanding more fairly and transparently.

After the interview, there was no followup from the HR. I kept on reaching out, but they decided not to pick up my call. It was harsh since i did not get a feedback loop.

Interview process includes 2-3 rounds. 2 technical and 1 HR. Focuses on core technical skills touch based every skills required for an automation test engineer. Didn't provided the offer because of 3 months notice period.