Walking Tree Technologies

I interviewed there, and the HR team initially asked me to complete the first assessment round, which lasted approximately 3 hours. The questions were extremely difficult. There were 4 programming questions, all of them very lengthy and complex. In my opinion, it was nearly impossible to complete them within 3 hours; realistically, it would take around 10–12 hours. However, I was selected for the screening round, where HR asked me the following questions: 1. Introduction 2. Current CTC 3. Notice Period I gave my introduction in English and spoke for around 7–8 lines about my work experience and technologies. Despite this, I was rejected. My concern is that if they wanted to evaluate communication skills, they should have conducted the screening round before the online assessment. That way, I would not have wasted 3 hours taking such a lengthy assessment.

Balanced The interview process was fairly standard, with a mix of technical and managerial rounds. Questions focused on core concepts and problem-solving. The process was moderately structured but communication and feedback could have been more timely and transparent. Slightly Negative The interview process was average but somewhat disorganized. While technical rounds covered relevant topics, there was a lack of clarity in expectations and delays in communication. Feedback was minimal, and the overall experience felt inconsistent. Aggressive

I attended first round, I didn't get details of the interviewer and I didn't get any introduction from her either. Anyway, never heard back again from them. I even followed up for a feedback but no response, no courtesy, This is enough to know the culture of the Company.

It was a wonderful experience. All the HRs were very supportive and positive but due to relocation issues I had to deny the offer. The salary offered to trainee was also low but office enviorment was good .

I Interviewed with Walking tree a while back. Interview with HR team was good and informative then i had 2nd round with Lead UX of the company, he was quite a delusional person who was trying to undermine the candidate most of the time (though his background and design skills said something else). He asked me very irrelevant question and was pointing out my design mistake in my previous design and process. for sometime i thought i might me wrong in my design and process until i had another round with one of the AVP of the company and he was such a great guy to talk to he took time to understand my design process and ideology. Best part came when he called that "Lead" person in the room and proved him wrong for every design critique he mentioned in my design.