Mizuho

the interview setup was virtual, and the interviewer was very collected and sharp. Slowly, as it went, she dig deeper into more detailed intricacies of the work and also asked role based and hypothetical scenario based questions. Being really senior, they also sharply and accurately gauge one's demeanor and general attitude apart from the technical aspects. They are mindful of the timeblock, however mine got a little extended.

Applied through HR directly. Got a call for face to face round. They are surely early stage startup in India with nothing defined as a corporate. Started a big news for GCC all around. Most of the previous Swiss Bank employees are their leads. Thank you for the opportunity to interview for the Lead position at Mizuho. I appreciate the time invested by the panel and the opportunity to interact with the team. I would like to share some constructive feedback regarding the interview experience from a candidate and hiring manager perspective, with the intention of helping strengthen the process for experienced leadership and niche technical roles. One aspect that stood out was the lack of clarity around the organization structure, team vision, and the actual expectations of the role. As Mizuho continues to establish and grow its presence in the market, candidates interviewing for senior or lead positions generally look to understand: * The broader organizational vision * Team structure and responsibilities * Strategic direction of the function * Leadership expectations * Growth opportunities and ownership areas During the interaction, the discussion felt more centered around whether I would be suitable for an individual contributor role rather than exploring leadership, delivery ownership, architecture exposure, stakeholder management, or team responsibilities typically associated with a lead-level position. Additionally, a considerable portion of the conversation focused on the number of organizations I have worked with over the last decade. While career continuity is understandably an evaluation parameter, I felt the discussion did not sufficiently explore the depth of my experience, the scale of programs handled, transformation initiatives, hiring responsibilities, governance exposure, or the strategic contributions delivered across organizations. There also appeared to be limited familiarity with my profile and CV prior to the discussion. From my own experience participating in hiring panels and leadership interviews, a more structured and profile-oriented discussion generally enables a stronger and more meaningful evaluation process for both the organization and the candidate. Another important observation was regarding representation of the organization during the interview. Senior candidates often view interviewers as ambassadors or representatives of the company culture and brand. Typically, interview interactions also help candidates understand: * What the organization stands for * What the team is building * The challenges being solved * Leadership culture and working style * Why the opportunity is exciting and impactful In this case, the interaction felt comparatively transactional and lacked that broader representation of the bank, its culture, and its vision. As a result, the experience felt closer to an early-stage startup-style screening conversation rather than a structured leadership discussion expected from a global banking organization. I fully respect that every interviewer may have a different interviewing style and assessment approach, and my intention is not to criticize individuals but to provide candid and constructive feedback that may help improve the candidate experience for future hiring processes. Thank you once again for the opportunity, and I wish the team continued success in identifying the right candidate for the role.

I was supposed to have a 30 min first level call. The interviewer was extremely rude. Didn't even take time to introduce himself or give an introduction of the role. When I didnt give the answer as per him expectation verbatim he started accusing me of reading answers from online. I cut the interview within 15 mins. If this is their attitude in an introductory call imagine their work culture. i dodged a bullet there.

Two rounds of interviews. One is virtual with the Senior Project Manager and 2nd round was the Face to face interview with the Delivery head. Project Management questions were asked. They give you a senario and you have answer how will you manage the situation

HM reached out and had half an hour discussion. Too much friction in the conversation, very boring as well. They don't have the courtesy to even send a rejection or reply too for follow ups.